Skip to main content
A timber truck fully loaded with logs drives over a very simple wooden bridge in a forest.
© Thünen-Institut
A timber truck fully loaded with logs drives over a very simple wooden bridge in a forest.
Institute of

WF Forestry

Peer-reviewed articles of Dr. Peter Elsasser at the Thünen Institute

  1. 0

    Knoke T, Elsasser P, Kindu M (2024) Considering the land-cover elasticity of ecosystem service value coefficients improves assessments of large land-use changes. Ecosyst Services 68:101645, DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101645

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn068499.pdf

  2. 1

    Wollnik R, Borchers M, Seibert R, Abel S, Herrmann P, Elsasser P, Hildebrandt J, Meisel K, Hofmann P, Radtke K, Selig M, Kazmin S, Szarka N, Thrän D (2024) Dynamics of bio-based carbon dioxide removal in Germany. Sci Rep 14:20395, DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-71017-x

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn068882.pdf

  3. 2

    Müller J, Lettenmaier L, Mergner U, Paul C, Ammer C, Bässler C, Braunisch V, Brunzel S, Englmeier J, Georgiev K, Gossner M, Höltermann A, Kamp J, Kleinschmit D, Michler B, Sanders TGM, Bösch M, Elsasser P, Weimar H, Wellbrock N, et al (2024) Wald. In: Wirth C, Bruelheide H, Farwig N, Marx JM, Settele J (eds) Faktencheck Artenvielfalt : Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven für den Erhalt der biologischen Vielfalt in Deutschland. München: oekom Verl, pp 357-519, DOI:10.14512/9783987263361

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn068840.pdf

  4. 3

    Köthke M, Lippe M, Elsasser P (2023) Comparing the former EUTR and upcoming EUDR: Some implications for private sector and authorities. Forest Pol Econ 157:103079, DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103079

  5. 4

    Gordillo Vera F, Eguiguren P, Köthke M, Ferrer Velasco R, Elsasser P (2021) Additionality and leakage resulting from PES implementation? Evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazonia. Forests 12(7):906, DOI:10.3390/f12070906

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn063803.pdf

  6. 5

    Elsasser P, Altenbrunn K, Köthke M, Lorenz M, Meyerhoff J (2021) Spatial distribution of forest ecosystem service benefits in Germany: A multiple benefit-transfer model. Forests 12(2):169, DOI:10.3390/f12020169

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn063316.pdf

  7. 6

    Höhl M, Ahimbisibwe V, Stanturf JA, Elsasser P, Kleine M, Bolte A (2020) Forest landscape restoration - What generates failure and success? Forests 11(9):938, DOI:10.3390/f11090938

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn062603.pdf

  8. 7

    Bösch M, Elsasser P, Rock J, Weimar H, Dieter M (2019) Extent and costs of forest-based climate change mitigation in Germany: accounting for substitution. Carbon Manag 10(2):127-134, DOI:10.1080/17583004.2018.1560194

  9. 8

    Bösch M, Elsasser P, Wunder S (2019) Why do payments for watershed services emerge? A cross-country analysis of adoption contexts. World Dev 119:111-119, DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.010

  10. 9

    Gordillo Vera F, Elsasser P, Günter S (2019) Willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ecuador: Results from a nationwide contingent valuation survey in a combined "referendum" - "Consequential open-ended" design. Forest Pol Econ 105:28-39, DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.002

  11. 10

    Lorenz M, Elsasser P (2018) Ansichten und Einstellungen zu Wald und Forstwirtschaft in Deutschland. Allg Forst Jagdzeitg 189(1/2):1-15, DOI:10.23765/afjz0002017

  12. 11

    Bösch M, Elsasser P, Franz K, Lorenz M, Moning C, Olschewski R, Rödl A, Schneider H, Schröppel B, Weller P (2018) Forest ecosystem services in rural areas of Germany: Insights from the national TEEB study. Ecosyst Services 31:77-83, DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.014

  13. 12

    Weller P, Elsasser P (2018) Preferences for forest structural attributes in Germany - Evidence from a choice experiment. Forest Pol Econ 93:1-9, DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.013

  14. 13

    Bösch M, Elsasser P, Rock J, Rüter S, Weimar H, Dieter M (2017) Costs and carbon sequestration potential of alternative forest management measures in Germany. Forest Pol Econ 78:88-97, DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.005

  15. 14

    Elsasser P (2017) Monetäre Bewertung von Ökosystemleistungen: eine kritische Sicht auf einige Kritiken (Essay). Schweiz Z Forstwesen 168(1):14-20, DOI:10.3188/szf.2017.0014

  16. 15

    Wüstemann H, Bonn A, Albert C, Bertram C, Biber-Freudenberger L, Dehnhardt A, Döring R, Elsasser P, Hartje V, Mehl D, Kantelhardt J, Rehdanz K, Schaller L, Scholz M, Thrän D, Witing F, Hansjürgens B (2017) Synergies and trade-offs between nature conservation and climate policy: insights from the "Natural Capital Germany - TEEB DE" study. Ecosyst Services 24:187-199, DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.008

  17. 16

    Elsasser P (2014) Editorial zum Themenheft "Forstpolitik". Allg Forst Jagdzeitg 185(9-10):185-187

  18. 17

    Köthke M, Schröppel B, Elsasser P (2014) National REDD + reference levels deduced from the global deforestation curve. Forest Pol Econ 43:18-28, DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.03.002

  19. 18

    Elsasser P, Weller P (2013) Aktuelle und potentielle Erholungsleistung der Wälder in Deutschland: monetärer Nutzen der Erholung im Wald aus Sicht der Bevölkerung. Allg Forst Jagdzeitg 184(3-4):84-96

  20. 19

    Köthke M, Leischner B, Elsasser P (2013) Uniform global deforestation patterns - an empirical analysis. Forest Pol Econ 28:23-37, DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.01.001

  21. 20

    Riera P, Signorello G, Thiene M, Mahieu PA, Navrud S, Kaval P, Rulleau B, Mavsar R, Madureira L, Meyerhoff J, Elsasser P, Notaro S, De Salvo M, Giergiczny M, Dragoi S (2012) Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: good practice guidelines. J Forest Econ 18(4):259-270, doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2012.07.001

  22. 21

    Ciccarese L, Elsasser P, Horattas A,, Pettenella D, Valatin G (2011) Innovative market opportunities related to carbon sequestration in European forests? In: Weiss G, Ollonkvist P, Slee B (eds) Innovation in forestry: territorial and value chain approaches. Wallingford: CAB International, pp 131-153

  23. 22

    Elsasser P, Englert H, Hamilton J (2010) Landscape benefits of a forest conversion programme in North East Germany: results of a choice experiment. Ann Forest Res 53(1):37-50

  24. 23

    Olschewski R, Elsasser P (2010) Mehr als "Habitat" oder "Dienstleister"? Der Wald als Komponente eines Landschaftssystems. Schweiz Z Forstwesen 161(9):334-340, doi:10.3188/szf.2010.0334

  25. 24

    Leischner B, Elsasser P (2010) Reference emission levels for REDD: Implications of four different approaches applied to past period's forest area development in 84 countries. Landbauforsch 60(3):119-130

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/bitv/dn046677.pdf

  26. 25

    Elsasser P, Meyerhoff J, Montagne C, Stenger A (2009) A bibliography and database on forest benefit valuation studies from Austria, France, Germany, and Switzerland - A possible base for a concerted European approach. J Forest Econ 15(1-2):93-107, DOI:10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.005

  27. 26

    Krug J, Köhl M, Riedel T, Bormann K, Rüter S, Elsasser P (2009) Options for accounting carbon sequestration in German forests. Carbon Balance Manag 4:15, DOI:10.1186/1750-0680-4-5

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dk042777.pdf

  28. 27

    Elsasser P (2007) Do "stakeholders" represent citizen interests? : an empirical inquiry into assessments of policy aims in the National Forest Programme for Germany. Forest Pol Econ 9(8):1018-1030, DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2006.10.002

  29. 28

    Bernath K, Elsasser P, Roschewitz A (2007) Reduktion systematischer und zufallsbedingter Fehler in Zielgebietsdaten: Theorie und empirische Ergebnisse einer Waldbesucherbefragung in Zürich. Allg Forst Jagdzeitg 178(5-6):109-120

  30. 29

    Dieter M, Elsasser P (2002) Carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in the tree biomass of Germany's forests. Forstwiss Centralbl 121(4):195-210

  31. 30

    Elsasser P (2002) Rules for participation and negotiation and their possible influence on the content of a National Forest Programme. Forest Pol Econ 4(4):291-300

  32. 31

    Elsasser P (2001) Der ökonomische Wert der Wälder in Deutschland für die Naherholung: eine "Benefit Function Transfer"-Schätzung. Z Umweltpol Umweltrecht 23(3):417-442

    Scroll to top
    Follow us
    [Translate to English:] Logo des Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft